Q&A

The public modelled track record for each published strategy over a rolling 12-month window, plus a win/loss pattern and a locked-in five-year stress summary (each year starting fresh at the model bank). Datasheets also show the same qualifiers on three Working Bank paths — Fresh, Hybrid, and Continuous. The Strategy and Qualifiers are identical on every path. What changes is how the £5,000 Working Bank is treated. Fresh is a stress test, not an operating method. Continuous is passive. Hybrid resuscitates a bank that has fallen below £5,000 and is also the house IWB method. House IWB (charging): Hybrid · 1% of IWB · £50 collar · £100 cap. This does not change when you change Working Bank path or stake. A calculator for other staking choices comes later. Individual runners are not listed.

The same Working Bank funds many stakes over time — recycled as results settle — so turnover can be large relative to the starting bank without the member topping up. That is not borrowed leverage; it is applying an edge repeatedly when one has existed in the data.

No. They are modelled / illustrative paths under stated assumptions (start bank, stake %, stake cap, daily stake review, success fee on Internal Working Bank high-water marks only — annual seat fee outside that path). Past performance is not a guide to future results. Edges can fade; you may skip qualifiers; starting prices move.

The public modelling window ends on the last fully settled month (advances when that month’s results are confirmed and Strategies cache is reloaded). The five-year stress blocks are separate standalone years ending on that same date (join-timing stress — each year resets the model bank), locked in with each Strategies cache reload. A continuous seat over the same span is shown under the stress summary and compounds differently.

To protect the strategy from reverse-engineering and to keep the public page focused on bank path, volume and odds averages — not a selection sheet.